Interview with the Vampire (1994)
A vampire relates his epic life story of love, betrayal, loneliness, and dark hunger to an over-curious reporter.
- Neil Jordan
- Patrick Clayton
- Michael Stevenson
- Joe Burns
- Robert Legato
- Kevin De La Noy
- Mark Clayton
- Diana Dill
- Dominique Delany
- James Devis
- Jean-Philippe Blime
- David Carrigan
- Susan E. Fiore
- Paul Bernard
- Anne Rice
- Anne Rice
Rating: 7.4/10 by 5838 users
Alternative Title:
Interview with a Vampire - US
Interview mit einem Vampir - Aus der Chronik der Vampire - DE
Entrevista Amb El Vampir - AD
Interviu su vampyru: vampyrų kronikos - LT
Interview with the Vampire: The Vampire Chronicles - US
뱀파이어와의 인터뷰 - KR
En vampyrs bekännelser - SE
吸血迷情 - CN
En vampyrs bekjennelser - NO
夜訪吸血鬼 - TW
Country:
United States of America
Language:
English
Français
Runtime: 02 hour 03 minutes
Budget: $60,000,000
Revenue: $223,664,608
Plot Keyword: paris, france, based on novel or book, san francisco, california, vampire, bite, new orleans, louisiana, plantation, louisiana, pity, child vampire, gothic horror, 18th century, plague, 19th century, lgbt interest, reluctant vampire
This is a much more sophisticated take on the vampire through-the-ages narrative; but it has certainly dated in the almost 30 tears since Neil Jordan put together a stellar, if not great, cast to regale us with the tale of "Louis" (Brad Pitt) & "Lestat" (Tom Cruise). Told in flashback to a very sceptical reporter "Daniel" (Christian Slater), Pitt tells of his near 200 year life that started with his meeting with Cruise and his conversion to his immortal existence based on blood. It's a hugely lavish affair, with loads of lust, trickery, duplicity and gore - tinged with genuine regret, loneliness and sadness - and, of course, loads of cruel violence. Whilst it does nod to the whole "Hammer" style of horror thrillers - there is plenty of ketchup - the writing and characterisations have much more depth to them. Neither of the principal characters are likeable, but you do build some sort of reverse empathy with - at least Pitt - as the film progresses. The attention to detail on the sets and costumes as we march through time never lessens and contributes magnificently to a stylish, sumptuous glamour-fest. Much as they were/are doubtless box-office A listers, however, Pitt was just too young looking to be convincing, Cruise just can't really act at the best of times, much less with extra dental props and Kirsten Dunst just annoyed me in the best traditions of Shirley Temple. A shame, because the rest of this is superb.
