+

poster of A Room with a View
Rating: 7/10 by 738 users

A Room with a View (1986)

When Lucy Honeychurch and chaperon Charlotte Bartlett find themselves in Florence with rooms without views, fellow guests Mr Emerson and son George step in to remedy the situation. Meeting the Emersons could change Lucy's life forever but, once back in England, how will her experiences in Tuscany affect her marriage plans?

Directing:
  • James Ivory
  • Daniel Sonnis
  • Renée Glynne
  • Kevan Barker
  • Simon Moseley
Writing:
  • E.M. Forster
  • Ruth Prawer Jhabvala
Stars:
Release Date: Fri, Mar 07, 1986

Rating: 7/10 by 738 users

Alternative Title:
Un romance en Florencia - AR
Chambre avec vue - FR
Camera con vista - IT
Szoba kilátással - HU
Et rom med utsikt - NO
Quarto com Vista Sobre a Cidade - PT
A Room with a View - CN

Country:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Italiano
Runtime: 01 hour 57 minutes
Budget: $3,000,000
Revenue: $20,966,644

Plot Keyword: based on novel or book, england, tennis, kiss, surrey, bed and breakfast (b&b), florence, italy, skinny dipping, spinster, edwardian england, 1900s
Subtitle   Wallpaper   Watch Trailer    

Helena Bonham Carter
Lucy Honeychurch
Julian Sands
George Emerson
Maggie Smith
Charlotte Bartlett
Simon Callow
The Reverend Mr. Beebe
Rosemary Leach
Mrs. Honeychurch
Rupert Graves
Freddy Honeychurch
Patrick Godfrey
The Reverend Mr. Eager
Judi Dench
Eleanor Lavish
Fabia Drake
Miss Catharine Alan
Joan Henley
Miss Teresa Alan
Amanda Walker
The Cockney Signora
Mia Fothergill
Minnie Beebe
Peter Cellier
Sir Harry Otway
Matyelok Gibbs
New Charlotte
Patricia Lawrence
Mrs Butterworth
Mirio Guidelli
Santa Croce Guide
Luigi Di Fiore
Murdered Youth
Brigid Erin Bates
Maid at Windy Corner
Stefano Serboli
Fighting Youth
Phillada Sewell
Lady at Sir Harry's Garden Party
Margaret Ward
Lady at Sir Harry's Garden Party
James Wilby
Party Guest (uncredited)

Filipe Manuel Neto

**A film that seems to be more concerned with criticizing the manners of the 19th century than with telling us a good story.** The film is set in the early years of the 20th century and is a romantic story that begins when a young British girl stays in a guesthouse in Florence among other English tourists. The room she received does not have a view over the River Arno, so she agrees to exchange with a young man, with progressive and daring ideas, who will win her heart. When they return to England, the get-together is inevitable. I haven't read the book this film is based on, but I believe those who say the adaptation is respectful. Written by James Ivory, it won three Oscars (Best Costume Design, Best Art Direction and Best Adapted Screenplay) and was also nominated for other awards (Best Cinematography, Best Director, Best Supporting Actress, Best Supporting Actor and Best Film). However, if we think about it, almost no one remembers it nowadays, except for big cinema fans. As a romantic film, it works and fits into that cliché of couples who break conventions to experience love, a utopia that leaves the majority of the female audience daydreaming. It's not a bad story, but we know where it will end. There is a profound anachrony underlying the film. It is not visible in the production itself, which is luxurious and expensive, with excellent sets, makeup, hairstyles, costumes and intelligently selected props. However, watching the film calmly, we detect the anachrony in the way in which British society at the time was portrayed: etiquette, good manners and social conventions appear as “castrating” love and passions, when in fact few people in that society overvalued love in the same way we do. This must be in the original book, of course, but it is still a “black and white” vision of a past that is judged in the light of our eyes. Despite this, it deserves clear praise for the sets, costumes and props, for its magnificent cinematography, where warm colors and the most touristic landscapes and places in Florence (one of the most beautiful in Europe) stand out, and for an excellent soundtrack, solidly based on classical and lyrical pieces that may, or may not, be recognized by the public. However, what stands out in the film and gives it greater value is the extraordinary performance by a luxurious cast full of strong, talented and well-known names. A very particular ovation is justified by the work of Helena Bonham Carter, in her debut in the seventh art, marking the start of her great career in cinema. Equally incredible was the chameleonic Daniel Day-Lewis, who gave us an affected and pompous gentleman who gave soul and grace. Maggie Smith is always a safe bet, especially when she plays characters within her “comfort zone”, but I found her somewhat dull. Denholm Elliott is very good, but not incredible as Julian Sands, who has one of the central roles in the plot. He was one of those actors who would have done better by spending a little more time working in Europe before trying his luck in the USA. He was very good, but he lacked opportunities in the land where they supposedly appear. Allow me to make an aside: in one of those strange coincidences in life, I saw this film yesterday and just now saw, at the Oscars ceremony, this actor's name in memoriam by having passed away in 2023. What more can I say? Rest in peace.


My Favorite

Welcome back!

Support Us

Like Movienade?

Please buy us a coffee

scan qr code