+

poster of Flight of the Phoenix
Rating: 5.992/10 by 858 users

Flight of the Phoenix (2004)

When an oil rig in the Gobi Desert of Mongolia proves unproductive, an aircraft crew are sent to shut the operation down and fly them out. On the flight out over the desert on the way to Beijing, Capt. Frank Towns and co-pilot A.J. are unable to keep their cargo plane, a C-119 Flying Boxcar, in the air when a violent sandstorm strikes. Crash-landing in a remote uncharted part of the desert, the two pilots and their passengers -- a crew of oil workers and a drifter -- must work together to survive by rebuilding the aircraft. Soon, low supplies and a band of merciless smugglers add even greater urgency to their task.

Directing:
  • John Moore
  • Nada Pinter
  • Danny Green
  • Ferdi Burger
  • Jimmy N. Roberts
Writing:
  • Scott Frank
  • Edward Burns
  • Romek Delmata
  • Lukas Heller
Stars:
Release Date: Fri, Dec 17, 2004

Rating: 5.992/10 by 858 users

Alternative Title:
荒漠十壮士 - CN
Poletŭt na feniksa - BG
I ptisi tou Foinika - GR
Feniksov let - RS
Polet Feniksa - RU
Полёт Феникса - RU
Der Flug des Phoenix - Flight of the Phoenix - DE

Country:
United States of America
Language:

English
Runtime: 01 hour 53 minutes
Budget: $45,000,000
Revenue: $21,009,180

Plot Keyword: robbery, based on novel or book, sandstorm, pilot, gobi desert, mongolia, survival, disaster, airplane crash, struggle for survival, desert, based on movie, oil rig , desert storm, smugglers, cargo plane, crash survivor

drystyx

This could be one of those "so bad it's good" movies some day. It's a remake of the classic film about men in a hopeless situation when their small plane crashes in the desert. Hope comes back when one of the men reveals he can make an airplane, and the others believe him. In such a story, the subplots and side stories make the story. Here, the subplots and side stories are cartoonish and contrived. The characters are totally without motivation. One can almost see the actors wince about being part of such a horribly written story. In fact, one almost wonders if it was written for the purpose of some day being a "so bad it's good" story. I'm not sure. There really isn't any charm to this movie, no inspiration, no motivation, and that might be too bad to even make the "so bad it's good" list.

CinemaSerf

I think to be fair to this reimagining of the story, it tries to be different from the 1965 version. They shift the location and update the dialogue and up to a point that gives it a fighting chance. A plane gets caught up in a sandstorm over the Gobi desert and crashes. It falls to the survivors to work out a plan before the water runs out. Sadly, though, aside from the efforts from Giovanni Ribisi as designer "Elliott" (and that's because at times he resembles Hardy Kruger) the acting is pretty woeful. Dennis Quaid ought to be commended for taking on the Jimmy Stewart role - that was never going to be easy, but he just hasn't the screen presence. The rest of the ensemble form an unremarkable bunch and John Moore's direction does little to deliver any sense of peril or desperation as their predicament gets worse and their personal relationships become more and more fraught. It looks ok, but in the end comes across as little better than an OK television movie that I questioned the necessity for.

Narate

_"The design is perfect, the only flaw is that we have to rely on you to fly it."_ I grew up always seeing the poster but never watching this. Now that I have seen it, I can see why. It is a little boring and just not that interesting. Something tells me the original must be the one that has all the flavor.


My Favorite

Welcome back!

Support Us

Like Movienade?

Please buy us a coffee

scan qr code