+

poster of The Great Outdoors
Rating: 6.4/10 by 533 users

The Great Outdoors (1988)

It's vacation time for outdoorsy Chicago man Chet Ripley, along with his wife, Connie, and their two kids, Buck and Ben. But a serene weekend of fishing at a Wisconsin lakeside cabin gets crashed by Connie's obnoxious brother-in-law, Roman Craig, his wife, Kate, and the couple's two daughters. As the excursion wears on, the Ripleys find themselves at odds with the stuffy Craig family.

Directing:
  • Howard Deutch
  • Walter Scott
Writing:
  • John Hughes
Stars:
Release Date: Fri, Jun 17, 1988

Rating: 6.4/10 by 533 users

Alternative Title:
Dos Cuñados Desenfrenados - SV
Big Country - US
As Grandes Férias - BR
Tranquille le fleuve - CA
Wielka wyprawa - PL
Báječná dovolenka - SK

Country:
United States of America
Language:
English
Runtime: 01 hour 31 minutes
Budget: $24,000,000
Revenue: $43,455,230

Plot Keyword: attachment to nature, holiday, roommates, wisconsin, grizzly bear, cabin, best friend, family holiday

Kamurai

Decent watch at best, probably won't watch again, but can recommend for those on a late-eighties nostalgia kick. Sometimes it is good to get in "The Way Back Machine" and see some of the movies that made people famous, and I liked Dan Aykroyd and John Candy. The duplicitous plot and character choices just didn't sit great with me. Having recently seen "Brother Nature", it is interesting to see a movie that could have inspired it. I think it would have been a lot better with John Candy as an overwhelmingly positive buzzkill and Aykroyd playing a family man. But Candy is sort of the family man of the late 1980s, and Aykroyd is the quintessential New York scumbag, and they do it well. I'd ultimately say it is worth the watch, but there are probably a dozen "back to nature" movies I could recommend in front of this one.

kevin2019

"The Great Outdoors" is only a moderately entertaining film, although it does feature the unforgettably spectacular sight of John Candy water skiing. The grizzly bear action also works well and there is always an enthusiastic energy about this film which every member of the cast effortlessly maintains, but in terms of John Hughes's output this entry is not one of his more memorable outings and some of it does feel like miscellaneous bottom drawer material that has so far gone unused until now. He has done a reasonable job of using such material - if this indeed happens to be the case - as the basis for a mildly amusing film which is as watchable as it is because of Dan Aykroyd and John Candy. They are the ones who keep you watching even though you know everyone involved in front and behind the cameras has done so much better work elsewhere.


My Favorite

Welcome back!

Support Us

Like Movienade?

Please buy us a coffee

scan qr code