One, Two, Three (1961)
C.R. MacNamara is a managing director for Coca Cola in West Berlin during the Cold War, just before the Wall is put up. When Scarlett, the rebellious daughter of his boss, comes to West Berlin, MacNamara has to look after her, but this turns out to be a difficult task when she reveals to be married to a communist.
- Billy Wilder
- Tom Pevsner
- André Smagghe
- May Wale Brown
- I. A. L. Diamond
- Billy Wilder
- Ferenc Molnár
Rating: 7.5/10 by 358 users
Alternative Title:
Uno, Dos, Tres - ES
Een, twee, drie - BE
En, to, tre og et lillebitte hop - DK
Yks', kaks', kolme - FI
Ena... dyo... tria - GR
Country:
United States of America
Language:
Deutsch
English
Pусский
Runtime: 01 hour 49 minutes
Budget: $3,000,000
Revenue: $4,000,000
Plot Keyword: prison, capitalist, berlin, germany, communist, clerk, cold war, pregnancy, atlanta, coca-cola, soviet union, headquarter, iron curtain, totalitarian regime, joke, chamber of commerce, east berlin, west berlin, principal, wedding, american, baffled, cheerful
Amazing Cagney performance in a film that has no resonance now. C.R. MacNamara is the head of Coca-Cola's bottling interests in Germany, he is a forceful man who wants to be all that he can be. He hopes to be the head of European operations for the company and is well on his way until the teenage daughter of Coca-Cola big wig Wendell P. Hazeltine shows up and he is asked to baby-sit her for a two week trip thru the continent. I wish I could have been around to watch this on its release in 1961, for I'm sure I would of laughed my head off at the relevant jokes of the time. Full of communist bluster dialogue and jokes in keeping with the times, One, Two, Three has all the trademarks of a classic Billy Wilder/I.A.L. Diamond picture. Yet viewing it now, one finds that the jokes are tired and weary, and although the frenetic pace of the film is incredible {it really is like a scattergun exploding upon the viewers senses}, the film is something of an archaic oddity. Boasting a quite brilliant performance from James Cagney, the picture is never less than watchable, but the advent of time means the film is stuck firmly in 1961, regardless of the fine work from lead man and director alike. 6/10
