+

poster of Cosmopolis
Rating: 5.7/10 by 1236 users

Cosmopolis (2012)

Riding across Manhattan in a stretch limo during a riot in order to get a haircut, a 28-year-old billionaire asset manager's life begins to crumble.

Directing:
  • Walter Gasparovic
  • Jack Boem
  • David Cronenberg
  • Dug Rotstein
Writing:
  • David Cronenberg
  • Don DeLillo
Stars:
Release Date: Fri, May 25, 2012

Rating: 5.7/10 by 1236 users

Alternative Title:
夢遊大都會 - TW
堕乐迷城 - CN
코스모폴리스 - KR

Country:
Canada
France
Language:
English
Runtime: 01 hour 49 minutes
Budget: $20,500,000
Revenue: $6,063,556

Plot Keyword: homeless person, bookshop, bodyguard, paparazzi, limousine, anarchist, murder, billionaire, limousine driver, squatting, barber, voice recognition, deformity
Subtitle   Wallpaper   Watch Trailer    

Sarah Gadon
Elise Shifrin
Mathieu Amalric
André Petrescu
K'Naan
Brutha Fez
Paul Giamatti
Benno Levin
George Touliatos
Anthony Adubato
Abdul Ayoola
Ibrahim Hamadou
Jadyn Wong
Cathy Lee
David Schaap
Arthur Rapp
Philip Nozuka
Michael Chin
Goûchy Boy
Kosmo Thomas
Warren Chow
Arthur's Attacker
Ryan Kelly
Rat Man #1
John Batkis
Photographer #1
Saad Siddiqui
Photographer #2
Anna Hardwick
Photographer #3 - Jenn
Milton Barnes
Videographer #1
Albert Gomez
Counterman
Inessa Frantowski
Woman Holding Rat

talisencrw

I really enjoyed this Cronenberg film. Though my favourite films of his are the incredible ones he did in my teens, during the 80's ('Videodrome', 'The Dead Zone' and 'The Fly' are nothing short of outstanding, and works that no one else could have come up with), he's really been thinking outside of the box for the past decade (even for a consistently interesting creature such as he), and it's only been recently, with both Sarah Polley and Denis Villeneuve emerging as vital directors, that his ranking as the greatest Canadian director ever has even had suitable competition for comparison. I remembered when this came out, and I believe a critic from 'The Globe and Mail' interviewed Cronenberg at its opening at Cannes, and he was almost apologetic about using Pattinson. It sounded like he didn't want to have to direct him. He made the excuse that he couldn't get funding for his projects from North America anymore, which is a dirty rotten shame, and had to go to Europe and Asia any time he wanted to make a film in order to have it bankrolled, and the Japanese insisted on star power to put moviegoers in the seats, and said there'd only be financial backing if Cronenberg directed Pattinson. This was my first experience watching the actor's work, and he did a fine job, no problem. The supporting cast was strong, with many of my favourite character actors of late, such as Paul Giamatti and Jay Baruchel. The script, co-written by Cronenberg, was a strong statement about just how out of touch the very rich are with the other 99% of us. I docked my mark by 1/10 because I was pissed off that Cronenberg degraded one of the finest actresses of our lifetime, Juliette Binoche here. I can't even talk about it. It was as difficult for me to tolerate as Spike Lee having Christopher Plummer call Jodie Foster something awful in the otherwise excellent 'Inside Man'. Lee's off my Christmas card list for sure this year, but Cronenberg being a fellow Canadian (I bet you thought I was going to say white, hahaha), I'll be less angry. But he better look over his shoulder if he tries something like THAT again. I was THAT close to crossing HIM off my Christmas card list too... I also remember from the time the film came out, an article and rating on the film (I think it was 'The Globe and Mail' as well, and by the same critic who had earlier interviewed him), saying that when he watched it, he watched a few teenage girls leaving the theatre (most probably because Pattinson was in it), saying it was the worst movie they had ever seen. That's the only evidence you need that this is a fine movie, well worth your time.


My Favorite

Welcome back!

Support Us

Like Movienade?

Please buy us a coffee

scan qr code