+

poster of Bird
Rating: 6.837/10 by 319 users

Bird (1988)

Saxophone player Charlie ‘Bird’ Parker comes to New York in 1940 and is quickly noticed for his remarkable way of playing. He becomes a drug addict but his loving wife Chan tries to help him.

Directing:
  • Clint Eastwood
  • Lloyd Nelson
Writing:
  • Joel Oliansky
Stars:
Release Date: Wed, Jun 01, 1988

Rating: 6.837/10 by 319 users

Alternative Title:
Bird - FR
Птицата - BG

Country:
United States of America
Language:
English
Runtime: 02 hour 41 minutes
Budget: $9,000,000
Revenue: $2,000,000

Plot Keyword: jazz, heroin, saxophone, biography, psychiatric hospital, heroin addict, electroconvulsive therapy, death of daughter, bebop, eiffel tower, paris, 1950s

Forest Whitaker
Charlie 'Bird' Parker
Diane Venora
Chan Parker
Samuel E. Wright
Dizzy Gillespie
Keith David
Buster Franklin
Glenn Wright
Alcoholic Patient
George Orrison
Patient with Checkers
Bill Cobbs
Dr. Caulfield
Hamilton Camp
Mayor of 52nd Street
Chris Bosley
First Doorman
George T. Bruce
Second Doorman
Jo De Winter
Mildred Berg
Richard Zavaglia
Ralph the Narc
Al Pugliese
Owner - Three Deuces
Lou Cutell
Bride's Father
Roger Etienne
Parisian Emcee
Gretchen Oehler
Southern Nurse
Richard McKenzie
Southern Doctor
Tony Cox
Pee Wee Marquette
Diane Salinger
Baroness Nica
Penelope Windust
Bellevue Nurse
Ann Weldon
Violet Wells

r96sk

I personally found 'Bird' - directed by Clint Eastwood - to be an absolute slog to sit through. It's an interesting story no doubt, but it's told in the most mundane and boring way possible. I didn't know anything about Charlie Parker beforehand, which is what kept that aforementioned interest there. I'm no jazz fan either, but I am always happy to listen to it when it comes up though. Despite that, I just couldn't get into the film itself. It just felt like it was 160 minutes (!) worth of the following on repeat: performance, drunk and/or depressed, performance, drunk and/or depressed etc. I didn't feel like I was learning anything about Parker and his life. I literally gave an internal cheer when the credits finally rolled around. I do enjoy Forest Whitaker as an actor and he is probably the reason I'm not rating this lower. As for the rest, I don't even recall any of them - though I'm putting that down to what I've already noted, as opposed to the cast themselves who I'm sure tried their upmost. Way too long, in short. As I said it's an intriguing person to make a film about, an around 100 minute production would've been perfect in my opinion. A shame, all in all.


My Favorite

Welcome back!

Support Us

Like Movienade?

Please buy us a coffee

scan qr code